Thomas plays race card to dodge Wright criticism
Thursday, April 03, 2008
"On Sunday, May 18, 2008 – the Sunday after Pentecost, which also happens to be called Trinity Sunday in the ecumenical calendar – we are asking our 10,000 UCC pastors across the nation to use their pulpits to address the subject of race. We believe this is an important first step in beginning the broader conversation that needs to take place in our nation, in our communities and, especially, in our houses of worship. Over the next six weeks we will be equipping our pastors and lay leaders to help them prepare for May 18 and for the important conversations to follow."The effort to have a national conversation on race would be admirable had it not been hastily called for in response to the criticism that Thomas and the UCC has been facing in defense of comments in sermons and in publications by Trinity's former minister, Jeremiah Wright, Jr. who did not even attend the press conference. As disgusting and vulgar as it sounds, Thomas appears to be playing the race card to dodge the criticism which ultimately undermines the very conversation on race that he and others are seeking.
The consequences of this will be damaging on a number of levels. First, Thomas has made it pretty clear that he's not going to actually respond to the concerns raised within and outside of the denomination on Wright. Like so many other actions he and the national office have taken, it will be local pastors left to react and they really aren't being given much to work with here.
Second, members of the UCC are pretty wise to what is going on here. The problem isn't race, it's about Wright's comments and Thomas' reaction to them.
Finally, all this has really done is guarantee that this issue won't die down anytime soon.
(AP Photos / M. Spencer Green)
23 Comments:
hehe
This is so exciting for JT and JW. This is like 1968 all over again. There are battles to be fought! A kingdom to bring in! We are not old farts! We are needed! We are relevant!! It's a crisis! We're under attack!
These from those who pledge allegiance to a Lord who says, "Fear not." The United Church of Quixote.
To say nothing of the opportunity for publicity this is for those who wish we had a real voice in the public square. I'm sorry, but I think there are ways of being self-serving at every point on the theological/political spectrum and that it can be done with the trappings of faith and bought by the faithful.
We are all, me too, so very, very sincere.
Martin
The UCC pastors across this nation would do well to read these truths about race, instead of listening to JT's talking points. http://www.townhall.com/columnists/JohnHawkins/2008/04/04/six_uncomfortable_truths_about_race_in_america
As a nation we will never move forward regarding race if we do not address the real issues. JT has just brought attention to the world about how political the UCC is, and how it is impossible for us to address the issue - which should be condemning Wright for his hate speech from the start. Shame on Obama, the UCC, and Thomas.
Before anyone blasts me or calls me a racist, I lived in the black community for 16 years, where I was the minority. I, and my children had many black friends who cringed at the agenda of Jesse Jackson, trying to keep them down, and I'm sure if I went back there, they would not be thrilled with the likes of Jeremiah Wright. My children attended their friends' black churches, and they were quite the opposite of Trinity.
MAY GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
We do need to have conversations about race, but the pulpit is a monologue! Conversations will require getting outside your denomination. Go to the African-American clergy meeting and make some friends. then some real conversations can take place. As it is, we don't know how to interpret the nuances of language to begin to understand each other.
The problem with race relations has always been one thing -- we people can't treat people who look like us as Christ would have us do -- how can we ever treat those who look different ever stand a chance?
Nowadays of course this adage is changed to how hard it is to treat others who believe as we do in a positive way let alone those who don't see it our way.
To accomplish this requires supernatural intervention and the leadership of the UCC and most people in our country seemingly has just a little skepticism in seeking and trusting that kind of intervention lately.
It comes down to the fact that Christ is always the unity we must seek and anything taking the focus off of Him (which has always been my issue with JT and the leaders of the UCC) will fail.
This call to engage the "race issue" on Trinity Sunday again exposes a lack of true vision (and trust) in Faith being a unifier rather than using thre pulpit to empower sociological activity.
You don't think the Lord has anything to say about race?
But mostly, I think if we did a word count, we'd find out he talked about God and money. But mostly about God.
"On this day, the 40th anniversary of MLK's death, I am pretty sure MLK would be shocked at what some of his black brethren have been up to to destroy MLK's dream. His dream, as we are reminded, is to be looked at for the "content of our character and not the color of our skin". Isn't that what we all want? Unfortunately, there are some in the black community like Wright, (Jesse Jackson, et.al.) that have stifled this dream, repeatedly. The reverse of MLK's dream is what has happened for some -- not all, blacks in this country."
TruthToPower Says:
It's obvious that you know nothing of MLK his life or his ministry beyond the "I have a dream speech". By alot of your own standards Martin Luther King jr. would have made a crappy 'spiritual adviser' to being that he challenged the government on the war in Vietnam and calling the US government ARROGANT and the greatest Purveyor of Violence in the world! These are Kings words! I'm sure many in his denomination complained about the fact that King organized political movements from his churchs and also made statements relevant to the politics of his day from the pulpit.
The majority of White people including white liberals felt that what King was doing was playing the "race card" that everything would be fine if he just waited and shut up. They felt he preached 'hate'
Isn't it ironic that in 2008 we here the exact same sentiments.
As if the cross were wrapped in the American Flag.
After the unjustified war, the torture, and the continuing selling off of our infrastructures .. the UCC's main problem is who... JW, who applies scriptural text to todays real issues.
I'm shocked... maybe not so much actually
I'm glad you are posting here. I'd also like to invite you to join the UCCtruths message board at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ucctruths/
There are all types of opinions from all kinds of different people and I think your view of this would be valuable to the discussion going on there.
-James
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/this_world/4038375.stm
You can also research the historical to modern day Crisis of medical experimentation on blacks by watching this
http://truthabouttrinity.blogspot.com/2008/03/eugenics-and-social-darwinism.html
and reading the book Medical Apartheid by Harriet Washington M.D.
Now if will any of these sources prove that the government created AIDS to rid Blacks and Africans and Gays,,, no.. but it will give you some insight into why people like me wouldn't put it past the government to do so.....
And regarding the CIA and Drugs... there were almost hearings in congress to address the fact. Again, I'm not surprised that it was downplayed but RESEARCH and find out about it i don't care both pro and con
http://www.nytimes.com/books/98/09/27/specials/cia-thin.html
Elected Officials Show Quick Concern
As public awareness of the series grew, the paper began promoting it more aggressively. For readers wanting more, the Mercury Center carried a separate Gary Webb page, with a daily update of the reporter's appearances on a slew of radio and television programs.
Interest in the series was also fueled by more traditional means.
Senator Barbara Boxer, a Democrat from the San Francisco Bay area who assailed the Reagan Administration 10 years ago over another California newspaper's reports on the contra connections of Mr. Meneses, wrote the Director of Central Intelligence, John M. Deutch, on Aug. 29 to demand an explanation of the C.I.A.'s possible involvement in the matter.
No sooner had Senator Boxer's letter made headlines than the state's other Senator, Dianne Feinstein, also a Democrat, followed with a letter to Attorney General Janet Reno. Maxine Waters, a Democratic Congresswoman who represents part of South-Central Los Angeles, fired off her own letters to Mr. Deutch, Ms. Reno and the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Representative Henry J. Hyde of Illinois. Investigations were begun by the C.I.A., the Justice Department and the House Intelligence Committee.
Of the many politicians who have voiced outrage over the C.I.A.'s purported role in the drug trade, none have been more vigorous than Representative Waters, who has held news conferences, given speeches, churned out handbills and led a demonstration over the reports.
''The impact and the implications of the Meneses/Blandon/Ross/contra/C.I.A. crack cocaine connection cannot be understated,'' the Congresswoman wrote to Mr. Deutch.
Thanks for the invitation.
I hope i can provide some insight into this particular situation.
And hopefully gain some understanding of others within the denomination.
There are several dynamics at play here and it's very interesting to watch.
Anon, just a reminder that simply because you haven't encountered the (surprisingly prevalent) belief that the US government manufactured AIDS and that the CIA sold crack in the ghetto to fund the Contras, doesn't mean that Rev. Wright is "lying" when he brings it up.
Rev. Wright is many things - shocking, direct, no-holds-barred - but there is no evidence that he is willfully dishonest. I think that's an unfair accusation.
Peace,
TR
I'm not sure we could call him a liar, but we could call him a "rumor monger" and a "fear monger" for spreading accusations that don't have the least bit of evidence to support them (and yes, the burden of proof falls on those bringing the accusations). It would be like holding on to that old rumor that Sen. Obama is a "secret Muslim" and is really the Manchurian Candidate in this election. No proof for that either...
When Rev. Wright talks about AIDs being an ethnic weapon, those critics who denounce him haven't examined the speculation that it might have originated in the Koprowski's polio vaccine experiment that was conducted out of Philadelphia.
Those who embrace this theory might find some support in the book, The River A Journey to The Source of HIV and AIDS, by Edward Hooper (Penguin, 2000). A white man wrote this book.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYmB9g8G0ss
Speculation doesn't equal proof. Most credible, mainline scientists debunk
Hooper's thesis. The commonly accepted working model is a mutated SIV virus that became HIV somewhere in the late 50's. What Sen. Kerry believes or doesn't believe doesn't hold hold much sway with me. :)
However, some folks will always see in every corner shadowy figures that are always lying to them. You may be one of those folks. As Swift once said, you can't reason someone out of something that they didn't
reason themselves into to begin with.
He's given them the NY Times ad, with its lip service to the UCC tenets of Congregational autonomy and unity in Christ, and then he's framed it as a sacred conversation on race along with a memo to the local pastors with talking points on how to define the issues.
Trinity is geting a PR Firm, all is well, and all will be well.
Those in agreement, say "aye."
The "ayes" have it.
Everybody else in conspiring to destroy the denomination, an unloving critic, or at least a spy.
Rev. Little "Bo" Peep
PS.
Anybody seen my sheep?